| 15:12 27/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| We would only own the patents for the mfcl. All others would be gmbh (mbh, wind, hydro) fbts By flyingbytheseat |
|
| 21:07 26/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| I suppose it depends on what the detail was behind this statement The Company has paid €150,000 in return for certain assets, settlement of all inter-company accounts and confirmation of full title to the necessary intellectual property rights to manufacture non- superconducting mFCLs. By WeRDoomed |
|
| 20:36 26/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| The 'gmbh' patents are not owned by us as far as am aware. fbts By flyingbytheseat |
|
| 19:01 26/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| Previously on this BB John said there are 8 patents related to mFCL. A quick search revealed a total of 190 patents under Zenergy. Some of these are Zenerdy GMBH, but I am assuming these may have moved over?? So there are approx 180 patents in addition to the mFCL ones that they may have control over. Some of these are quite unusual I have to say "Compositions and methods for making rare earth metal-Ba2Cu3O7-delta films are described". Some of theses others relating to superconductors may be of interest to a company such as Honeywell Speciality Materials (who they were doing some work with at one point) or some to other companies involved with superconducting. Maybe they just need enough money to fund 1 or 2 more demonstrators. On the other hand if they even get one of the 3 substantial orders then they may need money for other things. By WeRDoomed |
|
| 12:33 26/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| http://www.oceantomo.com/auctions.html as used by some heavyweight companies By foible |
|
| 22:06 25/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| from the ago statement "the Board believe that shareholders' interests will be best served by the Board considering in parallel other potential strategic options" sell the company or sell the IP - what else? That statement left a lot to the imagination. By griller |
|
| 19:14 25/04/2012 | Re: Goldman Sachs patents |
| Why would Zen want to sell the fcl patents? fbts By flyingbytheseat |
|
| 13:24 25/04/2012 | Goldman Sachs patents |
| according to Bloomberg the infamous Vampire Squid is ramping up its patents acquisition business. Cue Mr Cleaver! Get your money back (and some of ours) by using the squid's tentacles to sell off the patents to the Yanks. Zenergy is too small to make the most of what it has achieved like so many UK companies over the last 40 years with better research than commercial muscle. By griller |
|
| 13:02 20/04/2012 | TX2.... (Martin Eberhardt) |
| TX2, Martin Eberhardt .... Interim CFO at ZEN...  (Thanks fbts) Tempted to run for the hills, but love the technology, and SC involvement... But trying to fathom a reason for staying when ZEN has this guy hanging over them.. AE By Atrocity Exhibition |
|
| 12:14 20/04/2012 | sad to see this at these levels |
| i did have great hopes for this outfit, and i did bail out nursing a loss, but never ever did i think i would see 4 - 5 p GL if you are still hilding M By merc220cd |
|
| 22:24 19/04/2012 | Lightning strike disrupts trains |
| If only they had gone to Zenergy!! "Main line trains out of London travelling to the South East have been cancelled or heavily disrupted by lightning strikes. Network Rail said the lightning hit a power substation near Wandsworth causing major problems for signalling. A spokesman for the rail operator said it was "not looking good" for getting the problem sorted soon, adding that engineers were accessing the damage." Wouldnt need to assess the damage with an MFCL it would just carry on working. Hope the sales team are on the case! Maybe the commuters could chip in together and buy an MFCL wRd By WeRDoomed |
|
| 22:06 19/04/2012 | Re: Something is going on. |
| I think they should have reported when they crossed 10%, so why havent they? By Skeky |
|
| 18:19 19/04/2012 | Re: Something is going on. |
| Exactly, and Cloverleaf have crossed 13%, 12%, 11% and 10% without any announcement. John By John of Groats |
|
| 15:23 19/04/2012 | Re: Something is going on. |
| I believe that holdings reports only need to be issued if crossing certain percentages. fbts By flyingbytheseat |
|
| 13:42 19/04/2012 | Re: Something is going on. |
| As far as Aquaglow are concerned, neither the holdings reported on the website nor in the Annual Report agree with the latest RNS. AR 30/01/2012 - 2,370,032 (3.43%) Current website - 2,584,750 (3.74%) RNS 15/11/2011 - 2752,000 (3.98%) RNS 07/11/2011 - 3,401,750 (4.925%) RNS 12/10/2011 - 3,475,750 (5.03%) So any difference between the AR and the website is insignificant. Aqua glow has been reducing its holding for some time. As for Cloverleaf, there has been a reduction since the last RNS. AR 30.01/2012 - 6,489,390 (9.40%) Current website - 7,179,790 (10.40%) RNS 01/03/2011 - 8,579,790 (13.19%) This begs the question, why have there been no RNSs concerning their holding since March 2011? As the website does not give a date for the holdings, it is not clear whether they have been updated since the snapshot in the AR. The page was last updated yesterday but that does not mean that every item of data has been updated. Perhaps flybytheseat has been closely monitoring the page and can say when the holdings changed. John By John of Groats |
|